2007年11月22日 星期四

[轉錄]神奇啊!只有中文才能寫出只能看不能讀的文章!!

本文轉錄自: http://chitekim.blogspot.com/2007/11/blog-post_19.html

《施氏食獅史》是一篇由趙元任所寫的設限文章。全文共九十一字(連標題九十六字),每字的普通話漢語拼音都是shi,注音符號都是ㄕ。

《施氏食獅史》

石室詩士施氏,嗜獅,誓食十獅。施氏時時適市視獅。十時,適十獅適市。是時,適施氏適市。氏視是十獅,恃矢勢,使是十獅逝世。氏拾是十獅屍,適石室。石室濕,氏使侍拭石室。石室拭,氏始試食是十獅。食時,始識是十獅,實十石獅屍。試釋是事。
注釋

石 室裏住着一位詩人姓施,愛吃獅子,決心要吃十隻獅子。他常常去市場看獅子。十點鐘,剛好有十隻獅子到了市場。那時候,剛好施氏也到了市場。他看見那十隻獅 子,便放箭,把那十隻獅子殺死了。他拾起那十隻獅子的屍體,帶到石室。石室濕氣重,施氏叫侍從把石室擦乾。石室擦乾了,他才試試吃那十隻獅子。吃的時候, 才發現那十隻獅子,原來是十隻石頭的獅子。試試解釋這件事吧。



這是趙元任的另一篇短文:

《遺鎰疑醫》

伊姨殪,遺億鎰。伊詣邑,意醫姨疫,一醫醫伊姨。翌,億鎰遺,疑醫,以議醫。醫以伊疑,縊,以移伊疑。伊倚椅以憶,憶以億鎰遺,以議伊醫,亦縊。噫!亦異矣。

注釋

他 的姨媽過世, 留下億元財產. 他曾通告全城, 希望能醫治他姨媽的病, 於是有一位醫師前來醫治他姨媽. 第二天, 億元財產竟不翼而飛, 他懷疑是那醫師幹的, 並以此非議醫師. 醫師由於他的懷疑, 竟上吊自殺來去除他的懷疑. 他倚靠在椅子上來回想此事, 想到自己因億元財產失蹤而非議他的醫師, 竟也想不開而上吊身亡了. 唉, 也是太奇怪了!
曾任都柏林天文臺副台長的華人天文學家江濤,用同音字寫了一則71字的故事《易姨醫胰》,該文與《遺鎰疑醫》堪稱雙絕:
《易姨醫胰》

易姨悒悒,依議詣夷醫。醫疑胰疫,遺意易姨倚椅,以異儀移姨胰,弋異蟻一億,胰液溢,蟻殪,胰以醫。易胰怡怡,貽醫一夷衣。醫衣夷衣,怡怡奕奕。噫!以蟻醫胰,異矣!以夷衣貽夷醫亦宜矣!

注釋

易 阿姨悶悶不樂,大家叫她去看洋人醫生。醫生懷疑她胰臟有毛病,叫她靠在椅子上,用特殊的儀器移動他的胰臟,並設法取來一億隻特殊的螞蟻配合治療。結果胰髒 的液汁流出來,螞蟻死去,胰病得到醫治。易阿姨非常高興,送給醫生一套洋裝。醫生穿上洋裝,十分高興,非常精神。啊!用螞蟻來醫治胰髒的疾病,多麼奇特 呵!把洋裝送給洋醫生,又多麼適宜啊!

這篇作者季姬,他是誰網路上查不到,唸唸看吧,一堆的雞雞..
《季姬擊雞記》

季姬寂,集雞,雞即棘雞。棘雞飢嘰,季姬及箕稷濟雞。雞既濟,躋姬笈,季姬忌,急咭雞,雞急,繼圾幾,季姬急,即籍箕擊雞,箕疾擊幾伎,伎即齏,雞嘰集幾基,季姬急極屐擊雞,雞既殛,季姬激,即記《季姬擊雞記》。

注釋

季 姬感到寂寞,羅集了一些雞來養,是那種出自荊棘叢中的野雞。野雞餓了叫嘰嘰,季姬就拿竹箕中的小米餵牠們。雞吃飽了,跳到季姬的書箱上,季姬怕髒,忙叱趕 雞,雞嚇急了,就接著跳到幾桌上,季姬更著急了,就借竹箕為趕雞的工具,投擊野雞,竹箕的投速很快,卻打中了幾桌上的陶伎俑,那陶伎俑掉到地下,竟粉碎 了。季姬爭眼一瞧,雞躲在幾桌下亂叫,季姬一怒之下,脫下木屐鞋來打雞,把雞打死了。想著養雞的經過,季姬激動起來,就寫了這篇《 季 姬 擊 雞 記》。

2007年11月20日 星期二

HERO 電影版


超人氣日劇【HERO】登上大銀幕!
久利生公平 迎戰空前大危機!

劇情大綱

木村拓哉飾演的久利生公平調職到鄉下六年之後,再次返回「東京地方檢察廳城西支部」,與一班舊同事再度共事,卻馬上遇到前所未有的奇案。

趕著與未婚妻惠美(國仲涼子 飾)見面的里山(山中聰 飾),被男子圭介(波岡一喜 飾)撞倒而死亡,圭介簽下自白書坦承犯案,可是在法庭上,圭介翻供否認罪名,並在日本首席大律師蒲生一臣(松本幸四郎 飾)的辯護下,獲判無罪。

表面看來似乎是一宗單純的誤殺案,卻被久利生揭發出幕後黑手重重,牽涉到國會議員花岡練三郎(森田一義飾)、韓國罪犯等連串複雜人物,久利生到韓國與當地的檢察官姜明宇(李秉憲 飾)合力破案。久利生與雨宮舞子(松隆子飾)合力追查案件之際,兩人間若有似無、放下了六年的感情,也再次擦出火花。

平民的偶像

萬人迷木村拓哉飾演的久利生公平,是一個只有中學畢業,從不穿西裝的「另類」檢察官。雖然他染髮、形象放浪不羈,但他對案件一絲不苟、全力追查真相的精神,漸漸令「東京地方檢察廳城西支部」一班向來只求自保和升職的同事另眼相看。而久利生有話直說、充滿正義感、堅守信念、毫無束縛、勇往直前的人生態度,也被日本人視為他們現今最需要的Hero,最具代表性的英雄人物。

對木村拓哉而言,久利生公平也可說是他從影以來最成功的角色之一。他伸張正義、獨來獨往,不計較功名……擁有這一切脫俗的本質的同時,卻又沉迷電視購物,身上永遠穿一件橘色Bathing Ape羽絨外套,展示出他也有通俗、幽默風趣的一面。這一切特質都成為久利生的標記,也是觀眾至今仍對他念念不忘的原因。

官網:http://www.hero-movie.net/index.html

2007年11月19日 星期一

08 Election

無法查看此摘要。請 按這裡查看文章。

2007年11月4日 星期日

Interactive Games









More applications: http://blog-apart.com/

2007年10月28日 星期日

[好文共享] 我怎樣才能嫁給有錢人?

一個年輕漂亮的美國女孩在美國一家大型網上論壇金融版上發表了這樣一個問題帖︰我怎樣才能嫁給有錢人?

"我下面要說的都是心裡話。本人25歲,非常漂亮,是那種讓人驚艷的漂亮,談吐文雅,有品位,想嫁給年薪50萬美元的人。你也許會說我貪心,但在紐約年薪100萬才算是中產,本人的要求其實不高。

這個版上有沒有年薪超過50萬的人?你們都結婚了嗎?我想請教各位一個問題——怎樣才能嫁給你們這樣的有錢人?我約會過的人中,最有錢的年薪25 萬,這似乎是我的上限。要住進紐約中心公園以西的高尚住宅區,年薪25萬遠遠不夠。我是來誠心誠意請教的。有幾個具體的問題︰一、有錢的單身漢一般都在哪 里消磨時光? (請列出酒吧、飯店、健身房的名字和詳細地址。)二、我應該把目標定在哪個年齡段?三、為什麼有些富豪的妻子看起來相貌平平?我見過有些女 孩,長相如同白開水,毫無吸引人的地方,但她們卻能嫁入豪門。而單身酒吧里那些迷死人的美女卻運氣不佳。四、你們怎麼決定誰能做妻子,誰只能做女朋友?  (我現在的目標是結婚。)"——波爾斯女士

下面是一個華爾街金融家的回帖︰

"親愛的波爾斯︰我懷著極大的興趣看完了貴帖,相信不少女士也有跟你類似的疑問。讓我以一個投資專家的身份,對你的處境做一分析。我年薪超過50萬,符合你的擇偶標準,所以請相信我並不是在浪費大家的時間。

從生意人的角度來看,跟你結婚是個糟糕的經營決策,道理再明白不過,請聽我解釋。拋開細枝末節,你所說的其實是一筆簡單的"財""貌"交易︰甲方提供述 人的外表,乙方出錢,公平交易,童叟無欺。但是,這里有個致命的問題,你的美貌會消逝,但我的錢卻不會無緣無故減少。事實上,我的收入很可能會逐年遞增. 而你不可能一年比一年漂亮。

因此,從經濟學的角度講,我是增值資產,你是貶值資產,不但貶值,而且是加速貶值! 你現在25,在未來的五年裡,你仍可以保持窈窕的身段,俏麗的容貌,雖然每年略有退步。但美貌消逝的速度會越來越快,如果它是你僅有的資產,十年以後你的價值甚憂。

用華爾街術語說,每筆交易都有一個倉位,跟你交往屬于"交易倉位"(trading position), 一旦價值下跌就要立即拋售,而不宜長期持有——也就是你想要的婚姻。聽起來很殘忍,但對一件會加速貶值的物資,明智的選擇是租賃,而不是購入。年薪能超過 50萬的人,當然都不是傻瓜,因此我們只會跟你交往,但不會跟你結婚。所以我勸你不要苦苦尋找嫁給有錢人的秘方。

順便說一句,你倒可以想辦法把自己變成年薪50萬的人,這比踫到一個有錢的傻瓜的勝算要大。

希望我的回帖能對你有幫助。如果你對"租賃"感興趣,請跟我聯系。"——羅波.坎貝爾(J•P•摩根銀行多種產業投資顧問)

2007年10月25日 星期四

[轉貼] 愛情公寓榮獲2007年艾瑞最佳 Web2.0 及最具投資價值網站兩項大獎

上海10月26日電 /新華美通/ -- 日前,2007艾瑞 web2.0 暨互聯網投資年會在北京亞洲大酒店三層亞洲會堂隆重落下帷幕。國內知名的女性交友社區網站愛情公寓在此次“2007年艾瑞 Web2.0 大獎”評選中,獲得休閑交友類“2007年度最佳 Web2.0 網站”及“2007年度最具投資價值 Web2.0 網站”兩項大獎。

此次年會,艾瑞邀請了博客、社區、播客、搜索、分類信息服務及應用技術等眾多 Web2.0 模式的企業,大家就“如何通過改善用戶體驗來提高 Web2.0 網站的用戶粘性”開展了熱烈的討論。

會上頒出綜合博客類的獎項分別是:QQ(博客)、搜狐(博客)、新浪(博客);博客空間類是 51.COM;綜合社區類是百度(社區)、貓撲(社區);垂直社區類是天涯;學生社區類是校內網;汽車社區類是汽車之家;休閑交友類是愛情公寓。2007年度最具投資價值 Web2.0 網站:51.com、Discuz!、互動在線、愛情公寓。

愛情公寓在上線後短短的兩年時間注冊用戶就超過800萬,活躍用戶占到近50%。目前,愛情公寓已成為中國內地最具人氣的 SNS 網站之一。艾瑞市場諮詢研究數據表明,愛情公寓白領用戶的季度月均每人單日訪問次數增長迅猛。2006年三季度,愛情公寓白領用戶月均每人單日訪問次數為 1.66次,高於白領用戶對網絡休閑交友整體水平7.8%。到2007年一季度,愛情公寓已經高出網絡休閑交友整體水平95.5%,行業排名第一。

近日,愛情公寓喜事連連,除了剛獲得的艾瑞獎項外,主題名為“萬聖節奇跡上海夜” 的首次線下活動也在如火如荼進行中,報名參加的用戶已經超過愛情公寓預計數量,並且人數還在每天攀升。

資料來源:http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/071026/54/n2g5.html

你今天UGC了嗎? Principles of user generated content services

Principles of user generated content services
http://www.ugcprinciples.com/

1. UGC Services should include in relevant and conspicuous places on their services information that promotes respect for intellectual property rights and discourages users from uploading infringing content.

2. During the upload process, UGC Services should prominently inform users that they may not upload infringing content and that, by uploading content, they affirm that such uploading complies with the UGC Service’s terms of use. The terms of use for UGC Services should prohibit infringing uploads.

3. UGC Services should use effective content identification technology (“Identification Technology”) with the goal of eliminating from their services all infringing user-uploaded audio and video content for which Copyright Owners have provided Reference Material (as described below). To that end and to the extent they have not already done so, by the end of 2007, UGC Services should fully implement commercially reasonable Identification Technology that is highly effective, in relation to other technologies commercially available at the time of implementation, in achieving the goal of eliminating infringing content. UGC Services should enhance or update the Identification Technology as commercially reasonable technology that makes a meaningful difference in achieving the goal becomes available.

a. If a Copyright Owner has provided: (1) the reference data for content required to establish a match with user-uploaded content, (2) instructions regarding how matches should be treated, and (3) representations made in good faith that it possesses the appropriate rights regarding the content (collectively, “Reference Material”), then the UGC Service should apply the Identification Technology to that content to implement the Filtering Process described below. UGC Services should ensure that reasonable specifications, as well as any tools and/or technical support, for the delivery of Reference Material are made available to Copyright Owners. If a Copyright Owner does not include in the Reference Material instructions regarding how matches should be treated, the UGC Service should block content that matches the reference data.

b. The Identification Technology should use Reference Material to identify user-uploaded audio and video content that matches the reference data and should permit Copyright Owners to indicate how matches should be treated.

c. If the Copyright Owner indicates in the applicable Reference Material that it wishes to block user-uploaded content that matches the reference data, the UGC Service should use the Identification Technology to block such matching content before that content would otherwise be made available on its service (“Filtering Process”). The Copyright Owner may indicate in the applicable Reference Material that it wishes to exercise an alternative to blocking (such as allowing the content to be uploaded, licensing use of the content or other options), in which case, the UGC Service may follow those instructions or block the content, in its discretion.

d. Copyright Owners and UGC Services should cooperate to ensure that the Identification Technology is implemented in a manner that effectively balances legitimate interests in (1) blocking infringing user-uploaded content, (2) allowing wholly original and authorized uploads, and (3) accommodating fair use.

e. UGC Services should use the Identification Technology to block user-uploaded content that matches Reference Material regardless of whether the UGC Service has any licensing or other business relationship with the Copyright Owners who have provided such Reference Material (except that UGC Services may require that Copyright Owners enter into agreements with respect to the specifications for delivery of Reference Material that are commercially reasonable and that facilitate the provision of Reference Material by Copyright Owners and promote the goal of the elimination of infringing content). If a Copyright Owner authorizes specific users to upload content that would otherwise match Reference Material submitted by the Copyright Owner, the Copyright Owner should provide to the UGC Service a list of such users (a so-called white list).

f. UGC Services may, at their option, utilize manual (human) review of all user-uploaded audio and video content in lieu of, or in addition to, use of Identification Technology, if feasible and if such review is as effective as Identification Technology in achieving the goal of eliminating infringing content. If a UGC Service utilizes such manual review, it should do so without regard to whether it has any licensing or other business relationship with the Copyright Owners. Copyright Owners and UGC Services should cooperate to ensure that such manual review is implemented in a manner that effectively balances legitimate interests in (1) blocking infringing user-uploaded content, (2) allowing wholly original and authorized uploads, and (3) accommodating fair use.

g. Copyright Owners should provide Reference Material only with respect to content for which they believe in good faith that they have the appropriate rights to do so, and should update rights information as reasonable to keep it accurate. The inclusion of reference data for content by, or at the direction of, a Copyright Owner shall be deemed to be an implicit representation made in good faith that such Copyright Owner has the appropriate rights regarding such content. Copyright Owners should reasonably cooperate with UGC Services to avoid unduly stressing the Services’ Identification Technology during limited periods when Copyright Owners, collectively, may be providing an overwhelmingly high volume of Reference Material. UGC Services should reasonably cooperate with Copyright Owners to ensure that such Reference Material is utilized by the Identification Technology as soon as possible during such overload periods.

h. Promptly after implementation of Identification Technology, and at intervals that are reasonably timed throughout each year to achieve the goal of eliminating infringing content, UGC Services should use Identification Technology throughout their services to remove infringing content that was uploaded before Reference Material pertaining to such content was provided.

i. Copyright Owners and UGC Services should cooperate in developing reasonable procedures for promptly addressing conflicting claims with respect to Reference Material and user claims that content that was blocked by the Filtering Process was not infringing or was blocked in error.

4. UGC Services and Copyright Owners should work together to identify sites that are clearly dedicated to, and predominantly used for, the dissemination of infringing content or the facilitation of such dissemination. Upon determination by a UGC Service that a site is so dedicated and used, the UGC Service should remove or block the links to such sites. If the UGC Service is able to identify specific links that solely direct users to particular non-infringing content on such sites, the UGC Service may allow those links while blocking all other links.

5. UGC Services should provide commercially reasonable enhanced searching and identification means to Copyright Owners registered with a service in order: (a) to facilitate the ability of such Copyright Owners to locate infringing content in all areas of the UGC Service where user-uploaded audio or video content is accessible, except those areas where content is made accessible to only a small number of users (not relative to the total number of users of the UGC Service), and (b) to send notices of infringement regarding such content.

6. When sending notices and making claims of infringement, Copyright Owners should accommodate fair use.

7. Copyright Owners should provide to UGC Services URLs identifying online locations where content that is the subject of notices of infringement is found – but only to the extent the UGC Service exposes such URLs.

8. When UGC Services remove content pursuant to a notice of infringement, the UGC Service should (a) do so expeditiously, (b) take reasonable steps to notify the person who uploaded the content, and (c) promptly after receipt of an effective counter-notification provide a copy of the counter-notification to the person who provided the original notice, and, at its option, replace the content if authorized by applicable law or agreement with the Copyright Owner.

9. When infringing content is removed by UGC Services in response to a notice from a Copyright Owner, the UGC Service should use reasonable efforts to notify the Copyright Owner of the removal, and should permit the Copyright Owner to provide, or request the UGC Service to provide on its behalf, reference data for such content to be used by the Identification Technology.

10. Consistent with applicable laws, including those directed to user privacy, UGC Services should retain for at least 60 days: (a) information related to user uploads of audio and video content to their services, including Internet Protocol addresses and time and date information for uploaded content; and (b) user-uploaded content that has been on their services but has been subsequently removed following a notice of infringement. UGC Services should provide that information and content to Copyright Owners as required by any valid process and consistent with applicable law.

11. UGC Services should use reasonable efforts to track infringing uploads of copyrighted content by the same user and should use such information in the reasonable implementation of a repeat infringer termination policy. UGC Services should use reasonable efforts to prevent a terminated user from uploading audio and/or video content following termination, such as blocking re-use of verified email addresses.

12. In engaging in the activities set forth in these Principles outside the United States, UGC Services and Copyright Owners should follow these Principles to the extent that doing so would not contravene the law of the applicable foreign jurisdiction.

13. Copyright Owners should not assert that adherence to these Principles, including efforts by UGC Services to locate or remove infringing content as provided by these Principles, or to replace content following receipt of an effective counter notification as provided in the Copyright Act, support disqualification from any limitation on direct or indirect liability relating to material online under the Copyright Act or substantively similar statutes of any applicable jurisdiction outside the United States.

14. If a UGC Service adheres to all of these Principles in good faith, the Copyright Owner should not assert a claim of copyright infringement against such UGC Service with respect to infringing user-uploaded content that might remain on the UGC Service despite such adherence to these Principles.

15. Copyright Owners and UGC Services should continue to cooperate with each other’s reasonable efforts to create content-rich, infringement-free services. To that end, Copyright Owners and UGC Services should cooperate in the testing of new content identification technologies and should update these Principles as commercially reasonable, informed by advances in technology, the incorporation of new features, variations in patterns of infringing conduct, changes in users’ online activities and other appropriate circumstances.

2007年10月23日 星期二

Musicovery


Musicovery.com

Choose the music genre you like, and describe your mood right now. Then you could have your own webradio, even a favorite music list. Different rainbow-like colors will help you categorize the music genres. The random play by mathematical calculation will do a great help to find the specific type of music you like. Wanna buy the album? Links to different online music would help you immediately.

Shneiderman的八個經典使用者介面設計準則

Shneiderman的八個經典使用者介面設計準則是設計一個互動作品的最佳指南。

1.取得一致性

類似的情況應該有讓使用者有一致性的操作。在提示、選單與說明文件中,應該採用同樣的名詞。並且保持命令的一貫性。

2.讓重度使用者使用捷徑

當使用頻率增加時,使用者會希望減少互動的次數、讓每次的互動能夠一次做更多的動作。縮寫、功能鍵、隱藏功能與綜觀全局的功能,對專家來說非常有用。

3.提供有意義的回饋

當使用者做出一些動作時,系統應該提供回饋。越頻繁的動作,其回饋的強度可以低一些。越重要或不尋常的動作,其回饋強度應該要顯著一些。

4.設計對話產生結束

一連串的動作應該被組織成開始、中間、結束三部份。當動作結束的時候,要提供回饋讓使用者知道動作已經完成。在做下個一連串的動作之前,先告知使用者整個流程,能夠減輕使用者的壓力、提高滿意度。

5.提供簡單的錯誤處理

最好不要讓系統有嚴重錯誤的可能性。如果還是造成錯誤,系統應該能夠偵測出出來,並提供一個簡單、使用者可以理解的錯誤處理方式。

6.允許回到上一步

這個功能可以減低使用者的焦慮,因為使用者隻到做錯了可以重來。這個功能鼓勵使用者探索不熟西的選項。回到上一步的功能,可以包含一個、或是一連串的動作。

7.滿足使用者控制的需求

有經驗的使用者強烈的感覺到他們在控制系統,做出動作之後,系統提供回饋。系統設計上要讓使用者作為動作的觸發者,而不是回應者。

8.減少短期記憶需求

人類的短期記憶有限,因此顯示上要保持簡單、能同時顯示多頁資料以減少視窗切換頻率,減少記憶指令和動作順序的時間。

參考資料 http://www.lis186.com/?m=200502&paged=3 阿修的部落格

http://cd404.wordpress.com/2007/02/17/eight-golden-rules-of-interface-design/

2007年10月19日 星期五

Newser.com 視覺系即時新聞整合介面



2007年9月28日 星期五

2007年7月26日 星期四

2007年7月2日 星期一

廣告,無所不在

廣告,無所不在

文/方正儀


Jack的一天,從清早穿越公園來回的5km慢跑開始,運動過後回到家,他會拿出前一晚買好的法國麵包當早餐,再穿上才從乾洗店拿回來的西裝,神清氣爽出門去。他開了愛車,先到附近的藥局買東西,才進辦公室開始一天的工作。

這段短短一個多小時的時間裡,Jack看似沒有接觸到任何大眾媒體,但其實,從家裡到家外,他的周遭早已充斥著各種廣告媒體。

很難想像嗎?現在有愈來愈多的歐美日企業,開始開發所謂的bookvertising(書皮廣告)、breadvertising(麵包袋廣告)、 hangertising(衣架廣告)、carvertising(汽車廣告)、coolertising(飲水機廣告)……,用更精準的行銷方式深入消 費者的日常生活。

在廣告本質開始改變的今天,大眾媒體愈來愈式微,不論在電視、報章雜誌、戶外看板、甚或網路「刻意出現」的廣告,已經變成了討厭鬼,除非真的秀色可餐有創意,否則人人能躲就躲,效果自然不佳。

於是,以更具創意、更隨意輕鬆、更與環境和諧的方式傳遞資訊,而能達到廣告目的的「環境廣告」(ambient advertising),愈來愈被企業所採用。

環境廣告的實例俯拾即是,例如冷天冒蒸氣的街頭人孔蓋,變身為熱騰騰的咖啡廣告;捷運列車進站前亮起的紅色警示燈,就像難以忍受的頭痛,要平復它就來 一顆止痛藥。環境廣告利用消費者生活周遭的事物,傳達產品或服務的FAB(Feature特點、Advantage優勢、Benefit利益),又能讓人 會心一笑。

這種過往為廣告主及廣告公司拿來展現創意的模式,近年逐漸發展成一種business model。從一出手往往成為各獎項常客的創意廣告,到以此為業務主體的新媒體公司,不著痕跡的環境廣告,已經附著在我們生活的點點滴滴中。

從另一方面來說,這些環境廣告新媒體,正符合了點對點的「游擊式行銷」(Guerrilla Marketing)模式,讓小型企業可以微薄的預算,在噬人的市場中出奇制勝。畢竟,策劃廣告時,選擇適當媒體,精確瞄準目標群眾,比花大錢大手筆製 作,更能避免無的放矢的浪費。新business model告訴我們,小公司、小資金,不論對創意者或是廣告主,都一樣經濟有效。

文轉自 華文企管網 http://www.chinamgt.com/zone/news_today/news_show.php?n_id=937


 

2007年6月25日 星期一

購併不斷,線上廣告火紅

購併不斷,線上廣告火紅


文/張景翔

  沒有人會否認,線上廣告在廣告市場中已經佔有一席之地,同時也是網站的主要營收來源。線上廣告市場有多熱門?在過去六週之內,微軟購併線上廣告公司aQuantive,Google以31億美元收購了DoubleClick,Yahoo!買下Right Media 80%的股權,其他還有一些較小規模的購併案。在這麼短時間內有這麼多購併案,就足以說明線上廣告市場的未來的確令投資者有著無線憧憬。

  相較於其他的廣告形式,線上廣告的成長速度很快。根據美國IAB(Interactive Advertising Bureau)和PWC(Price Waterhouse Coopers)的統計資料顯示,2006年線上廣告收入較前一年增加35%,達到169億美元。而1999年網路泡沫化之前僅僅只有46億美元。

  華頓商學院的行銷學教授彼得菲德(Peter Fader)認為,線上廣告是必然的趨勢。和傳統廣告相比,線上廣告要追蹤廣告效果更為容易,同時也可以輕易的量化,線上廣告商也不斷研發新的介面工具,好讓客戶更能掌握廣告行銷效果,可以適時調整策略。

  即使如此,線上廣告在廣告媒體中占的比率仍然不高,根據美國TNS媒體調查公司調查顯示,2006年全美電視廣告約654億美元,雜誌298億美元、其他平面媒體279億美元,廣播則約110億美元。線上廣告僅超越廣播媒體。

  菲德教授表示,線上廣告的確讓廣告業產生變化,未來廣告商要思考的將是廣告的整合。如果客戶希望自家的廣告被普羅大眾收看,或者希望宣傳品牌形象,電視廣告仍然是十分有效的作法;如果客戶希望專注在某些特定族群,那麼雜誌廣告仍然是很好的標的;假如廣告的目的是達成交易,那麼線上搜尋的關鍵字廣告或許會更有效果。

  華頓商學院行銷學教授威廉斯(Patricia Williams)則表示,各種廣告媒體購買的基礎架構都不相同,這二十年來廣告界一直在尋求整合的方式,但卻沒有成功。線上廣告的崛起也讓廣告行業更形複雜。目前線上廣告的價格最低,而且成效可以量化,但由於網站成千上萬,供應十分充足而需求相對被稀釋,這也讓線上廣告的價格很難有大幅度的提升。

  威廉斯認為,每一種廣告媒體都有其必要性,電視和平面廣告價格雖然高,但如果客戶想把品牌資訊傳達給普羅大眾或特定族群,那麼選擇就很有限,價格較高也是必然的。畢竟,還沒有任何一則線上廣告的魅力能夠和超級杯美式足球賽總決賽時段的廣告相媲美,而且以後可能也不會有。

轉錄自 華文企管網 http://www.chinamgt.com/zone/news_ucanuz/news_show.php?n_id=1048